ADC, EFCC Clash Over Malami’s Continued Detention

The disagreement followed Malami’s arrest and detention by the EFCC in Abuja in connection with an ongoing probe linked to alleged fraud involving recovered Abacha funds. The anti-graft agency confirmed that Malami was first questioned on November 28, 2025, and later kept in custody after failing to meet fresh bail conditions.

The ADC accused the EFCC of turning its anti-corruption duties into a political tool. The party said the decision to keep Malami in custody raised doubts about the neutrality of the commission, especially as it came after the former minister attended a political gathering in Kebbi State. According to the ADC, there was no proof that Malami breached any bail terms, and the action of the EFCC appeared aimed at slowing his political ambition rather than enforcing the law.

The party stated that Malami, being a senior lawyer and former chief law officer of the country, understood the consequences of violating bail conditions. It added that restricting a citizen’s political activity was beyond the powers granted to any government agency under the Constitution. The ADC warned that blocking political participation under the guise of investigation could damage public trust in the anti-graft fight.

In response, the EFCC rejected claims of political bias and explained that Malami was never granted full bail. The commission said the administrative bail offered after his initial questioning was temporary and tied to five conditions that had not been met. According to the agency, Malami also failed to return for further questioning as scheduled on December 1, requesting more time on health grounds.

The EFCC stated that it allowed the request and shifted the reporting date despite the absence of medical proof. When Malami was invited again on December 8, he was detained pending compliance with the outstanding bail terms. The commission maintained that his continued stay in custody had nothing to do with politics and that it had no interest in his political plans or affiliations.

The agency also dismissed claims that it barred Malami from speaking to the media or taking part in political activities, describing such assertions as unfounded. It advised the former minister to meet the agreed conditions and cooperate fully with investigators so the probe could proceed without delay.

As the exchange continues, the ADC insists that the anti-corruption fight must remain fair and free from political influence, while the EFCC maintains that due process is being followed in Malami’s case.